Wednesday, November 7, 2012

GMO Food Labeling is a No Go in California


Aw crap!  It's a great day over all, but if you're like me then you're a little disappointed because Proposition 37 did not pass in California. I was extremely surprised! Proposition 37 required food retailers and companies to label products that contain GMO's, genetically modified organisms. It didn't include all food, for example food used in restaurants didn't require labeling. 

So here are a few facts. GMO refers to the scientific modification of the genetic structure of an organism to have certain defined characteristics. It is usually done to seeds for crops and in the U.S., the majority of our soybeans, corn, cotton and canola has been genetically modified. Because these crops are grown to the max in the US, you can find them almost everywhere. Just read the labels and you most certainly see soy or corn (or it's derivatives) located somewhere in the list of confusing ingredients.  

Some people argued that the prop wasn't enough, it didn't cover all food just some food or that there wasn't enough scientific data about GMOs, but shouldn't that be a reason to have it labeled in the first place? In my mind, prop 37 was a start. I think it's important that as consumers, we have the right to know what is in the products we are using, especially when it comes to food. What we eat becomes apart of us, our bodies break it down and new cells are formed. The truth is we don't know much about GMO's, whether they are good or bad. There is very little information out there about the advantages and disadvantages of using GMOs, but only time will tell. 

Millions of dollars poured in from the opposition, Monsanto, Hershey Co, Pepsi Co, huge companies that would have a lot at stake if such a legislation was passed. Their main concern being the possible negative impact of having such a label. People might start caring more about what they consume and choose other products instead. But I think these companies could care a little bit more about the people instead of their own welfare. But you know, it's all about the Benjamins. According to food activist Michael Pollan (the guy who says, "eat food, not too much mostly plants")  "Prop 37 has ignited precisely the kind of debate -- about the risks and benefits of genetically modified food; about transparency and the consumer’s right to know -- that Monsanto and its allies have managed to stifle in Washington for nearly two decades."  If prop 37 passed it could have taken some of the wind out of their sails and I'm all for that! There is little redeeming nutritional qualities coming out of Hershey and Pepsi, let's just be honest.

Sadly we are behind, several other countries already require GMO food labeling including China, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, countries in the European Union, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Russia, India and Chile, just to name a few. Europe has required GMO food labeling since 1997, for over 15 years now! It baffles me.  So it looks like it will be several more years until we come to our senses. 

Check out this video explaining more about GMO's.

I understand that a lot of Americans simply do not know much about nutrition and the roll it plays in the quality of life, or they simply do not care about it. But things are changing peeps! More people care about these issues. Hopefully in the near future there will be a better proposition regarding GMOs that people can get behind. But what can we do in the meantime? 

If you care about avoiding GMO's, here's what we can do.

Buy organic. Certified Organic food can not intentionally include any GMO ingredients. The label must say 100% Organic in order for it to be "safe". Here's a good site that explains it fuller.  http://gmo-awareness.com/2011/05/05/is-organic-always-gmo-free/

Buy local organic.  Buying locally grown produce is a great way to go. Get to know the farmer and their practices. Farmers markets are filled with organic and non-sprayed produce to choose from.

Grow your own. This is the way to go if you ask me. Just make sure to buy organic, non-GMO seeds. I'm telling ya, when I can get my hands on some land you can be sure I'll be growing as much of my produce as possible! There are too many advantages to doing this. 

Meat and dairy? Unless it says grass fed, organic, no hormones, no antibiotics, then it will have GMOs. Look for labels that say "No rBGH, rBST, or artificial hormones." 

By purchasing your food this way you are not only avoiding GMOs but you are also avoiding pesticides and other chemicals.  Just remember that when you are eating out, unless otherwise stated, the ingredients that restaurants use are, in most cases, the cheapest possible to save on costs. Therefore, they are probably filled with GMOs and other undesirable things. Just be mindful of it, I know it's not realistic to prepare every meal possible but cutting back on eating out will help tremendously.  

Like I said before, we don't know much about GMOs, they could even be beneficial! But until more scientific data comes out stating that it is truly safe, good for the environment, not harmful in any way then I'm staying clear. I'd rather not participate in the experiment.  Here's to not being a human guinea pig!! 

Cheers!
K




3 comments:

  1. Kristen,
    First off I agree that this should have passed and that a consumer has a right to know. But, I am curious what you think about changing the genetics of a plant in general. Cross-breeding of plants and fruits and vegetables for either a change in taste, or growth rate has been around for a long time. Many of the fruits and vegetables we eat today are hybrids or the result of cross-breeding.
    There can be a benefit to this on a mass scale, take what Borlaug did and dwarf wheat. It saved a billion people.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug
    I think we need to be informed and it needs to be actually regulated, but there can be great benefit as well. Curious to your thoughts on the process as a whole.
    Curt

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Curt! Cross-breeding or conventional breeding is used to express certain characteristics (faster growth, better taste) but these characteristics already exist naturally in the species itself. This seems to be ok, since it has been done for thousands of years. GM foods are sometimes considered an extension to breeding but the way it is done is not in a natural way for the species itself and could have certain consequences. Or it could be amazing and become the wave of the future. For me the thought of changing the DNA or combining the DNA of 2 or more different species (and whatever else they do to alter genes) is messing with nature. I truly believe that everything in nature is so intricately linked together and relient on everything else that even the slightest little bit of change has an effect. That is why I am wary of GMOs and feel that we have a right to know.

    Something I didn't mention in the post is the fact that the number of food allergies and other diseases (autism, celiac) have grown so dramatically in the last 20 years and no one really knows why. Perhaps there could be a connection with GMOs? Who knows. Thanks for commenting!

    ReplyDelete
  3. That is the on going question for science, we can do something, but should we do something? It is always a matter of degree I guess, how far do you push the envelope and it is for humanity, like Borlaugh and dwarf wheat or profit? Although many things designed solely for profit can benefit all as well.
    It is good that you are thinking about it and trying to make others think about it as well.
    As for the food allergy question, that is certainly a good one to ask. And it is quite possible that it is related. I can't go there on autism. I think the uptick in cases is more about knowing how to properly diagnose kids with autism and aspergers and a greater awareness of it being a real condition and not just writing these kids off as bad kids with temper problems. Also there was a recent study that I read about in the NY Times about a link between autism and the increasing age of fathers.
    Either way, it is food for thought at least. :)

    ReplyDelete